Ajay Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77921 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2018 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ======================================================

1. Ajay Paswan

2. Mukesh Paswsan.

3. Bablu Paswan. All sons of Late Ramasidhar Paswan, residents of village Daulatpur, P.S. Jehanabad, District Jehanabad ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2019 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 365 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354B, 448, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act. Allegation as per FIR is that accused persons entered inside the house of the informant, abused her and assaulted her and also tried to outrage the modesty of minor daughter of informant and for that Panchayati was held and there is allegation against petitioner No.1 that he snatched a gold ear ring.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegation of outraging modesty is against co-accused and not the petitioners and there is dispute between the parties from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77921 of 2018(2) dt.04-01-2019 2/2 before.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 365 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that petitioners have to co-operate in investigation, otherwise their bail bonds shall be cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T