Birendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.278 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1579 of 2015 ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Singh son of late Tej Pratap Singh resident of Sanjay Gandhi Nagar , Road No. 2, Hanuman Nagar, PS- Patrakar Nagar, DistrictPatna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi the Principal Secretary , Transport Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi Administrator Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
4. Sri. A. K. Choudhary , The Financial Advisor-cum-Chief Accountant Officer, Bihar State Road Corporation Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna .... .... O.P./s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Singh For the O.P. /s : AC to A.A.G. No. 10 Sri Prabhat Kumar Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard Mr. Kumar Rajeev, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to A.A.G. No. 10 and Sri Prabhat Kumar Verma, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri Jainendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel , who has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties /officials of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation.
The present petition was filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against opposite parties on an allegation of willful disobedience to an order dated 24.7.2015. By the said order
Patna High Court MJC No.278 of 2017 (4) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 the writ petition i.e. CWJC No. 1579 of 2015 was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file their individual representation before the Financial Advisor- cum- Chef Accounts Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation who was required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. It was indicated that if the claim of the petitioners is considered as genuine, he may pass order for payment. A claim was made that on amount of contributory provident fund interest was calculated up to the date of retirement, whereas the petitioners were entitled to get interest on delayed payment one month prior to the date of payment. Sri Verma, learned senior counsel, on instruction submits that in compliance with the order of the writ court interest was calculated and total amount of Rs. 5,92,421/- has already been credited to the account of the petitioner through R.T.G.S.
In view of submission made by Sri Verma, learned senior counsel , there is no need to further keep the matter pending.
The petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T