Babloo Kumar @ Bablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77968 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA GRP CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Babloo Kumar @ Bablu Yadav S/o Shyamdeo Yadav, R/o Vill.- Golakpur, P.S.- Kakopali, District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with G.R.P. Patna P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is recovery of stolen mobile from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case on basis of suspicion. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 13.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77968 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rail Patna, in connection with G.R.P. Patna Jn. P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T