Ravi Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53196 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2022 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR YADAV Son of Surendra Yadav R/o Village - Lamuniya, P.S.- Sugauli, Dist.- E. Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 147, 290, 341, 323, 332, 353, 354, 427 and 504 of IPC.
Allegedly, on account of some altercation, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioner accused have blocked the National Highway and they were damaging the government property and when the informant along with police force reached there, all the accused persons assaulted them and they also caused hindrance in performing the official duty of the informant and police officials. There is further allegation against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53196 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/3 the accused persons that they were molesting the female passengers at the place of occurrence.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The petitioner has no knowledge about the occurrence. He was not present at place of occurrence. His name has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is student. He has no concern with allegation of the informant. There is specific allegation against the other coaccused. He is implicated in this case due to student leader. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53196 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 3/3 below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 222/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T