Bibi Sanjira Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14018 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Bibi Sanjira Khatoon Wife of Phool Mohammad @ Ful Mohammad, Resident of Village-Kumma, P.S.-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi. 2.

Phool Mohammad @ Ful Mohammad, s/o Late Md. Rafique, Resident of Village-Kumma, P.S.-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi. 3.

Munna Mansoori @ Md. Nizamuddin, S/o Phool Mohammad @ M Ful Mohammad, Resident of Village-Kumma, P.S.-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 3.

The Additional District Magistrate (Revenue), Sitamarhi. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

5.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi. 6.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Parihar, District-Sitamarhi. 7.

The Circle Officer, Sursand, Sitamarhi.

8.

The Officier-in-Charge, Sursand, Sitamarhi.

9.

The Mukhia Gram Panchayat Raj Kumma, District-Sitamarhi. 10.

The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Raj Kumma, Block-Sursand, DistrictSitamarhi. 11.

Akhtari Khatoon W/o Late Shafique Ansari, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

12.

Aftab Mansoori @ Mister, Son of Shafique Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

13.

Bachcha Mansoori, son of Shafique Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

14.

Firoj Mansoori, son of Shafique Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

15.

Tammane Mansoori, Son of Shafique Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

16.

Ayub Masoori, son of Akub Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

17.

Hakim Mansoori, son of Akub Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

18.

Kadir Mansoori, son of Akub Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

19.

Kayum Mansoori, son of Akub Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

20.

Mahfooz Mansoori, son of Kayum Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14018 of 2022(4) dt.28-08-2023 2/3 Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

21.

Mehtar Mansoori, son of Kayum Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

22.

Maksood Mansoori, son of Kayum Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

23.

Fekani Khatoon, wife of Kayum Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

24.

Tasim Mansoori, S/o Kayum Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

25.

Hemza Mansoori, S/o Kadir Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

26.

Danish Mansoori, S/o Master Mansoori, resident of Kumma, P.S. Sursand, District-Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For direction/order to the respondent No.2 the Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi to set up an enquiry against the conduct of Circle Officer, Sursand and the Officer-in-Charge, Sursand who are sitting iddle on the point of demolition of her (Petitioner No.1) house constructed on self purchased land property without any injury caused to the other Private respondents and the private respondents have taken the law in their hand when the dwelling house constructed on her (Petitioner no.1) own land property has been demolished in collusion with the local authorities.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14018 of 2022(4) dt.28-08-2023 3/3 (ii). For the Direction/Order to the state respondents concern to restore the dwelling house similar as she constructed on herself purchased land (Pucca house).

(iii). For the Direction/Order to the Private Respondents No.10 to 26 to pay the compensation to the petitioners with the other needful legal assessed amount as the cost of harassment and defamation in the society."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U