Ajay Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56412 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2024 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== AJAY MAHTO SON OF MAHESH MAHTO Resident of Village - Rampatti, Raghubir Chouk, P.S. - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the IPC and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No.176 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases and allegation is of recovery of 405 liters of liquor from a bamboo orchard.

4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56412 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/3 possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of local people, but then submits that police in majority of the cases implicates either at the instance of the Chowkidar or local person in a mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation.

5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No.176 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56412 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 3/3 found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T