Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74388/2018bail granted

Nikesh Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-12Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74388 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2017 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Nikesh Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar, s/o Badri Yadav, r/v-Jhitkiya, Kalhautha, P.S.-Gwalpara, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 81/2017, registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, section 414 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no recovery from possession of this petitioner. He is not named in the written report. No test identification parade has been held. Learned District & Sessions Judge, Madhepura has mentioned in the impugned order that one Lalu Yadav was arrested by the police and one blue colour Nokia mobile has been recovered from his possession, who disclosed the name of this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74388 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 81/2017, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be close relative of petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) vinita/- U T