Anod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55709 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2020 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

ANOD YADAV S/O LATE DEO NARAYAN YADAV R/O VILLAGESAKHAURI, P.S- SAUR BAZAR, DISTT.- SAHARSA. 2.

VINOD YADAV @ BINOD YADAV S/O LATE DEO NARAYAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE- SAKHAURI, P.S- SAUR BAZAR, DISTT.- SAHARSA. ... ... petitioners/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the petitioners/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 384, 379, 323, 341, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the co-accused persons is of assaulting the informant by means of pistol butt. It is further alleged that the petitioners snatched golden chain and wrist watch from the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55709 of 2023(2) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 old dispute. They have committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and there is no allegation of assaulting to the informant against these petitioners. On the basis of suspicion and due to their criminal antecedents, they have been implicated in the present case by the police. He further submitted that the others co-accused have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 14.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38141 of 2021. They are languishing in judicial custody for about three months.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 32 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U