Babloo Kumar Singh @ Bablu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51245 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Babloo Kumar Singh @ Bablu Singh S/o- Vijay Singh Village- Sabalpur-28, Ward No.14 @ Sabalpur @ Sabalpur Athaeish Tola, P.S.- Sonepur @ Sonpur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 02.06.2025, in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 02.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Recovery is of 700 litres of country made liquor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2025 and it appears from the F.I.R. that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51245 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/3 and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of disclosure made by local choukidar. It appears from the seizure list that the recovery has been made near Sukhdav Ghat in Sabalpur Chaharam Diyara and petitioner has no concern at all with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor and on the basis of disclosure made by local choukidar, the name of the petitioner has been transpired.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51245 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T