Patna High CourtCWJC/7857/2017disposed

Rabindra Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-19The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7857 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Rabindra Nath Singh, S/o Late Srimurat Singh, R/o- Daulatpur Gandhitola, P.S.- Fatuah, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Commissioner, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

5. The Executive Engineer, Patna City Division, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

6. The Assistant Engineer, Patna City Division, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

7. The Junior Engineer Patna City Division, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

8. The Section Officer, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Pandey, Advocate Mr. Avinash, Advocate Mr. Kritya Nand Jha, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kr. Pradhan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-07-2017 It is the grievance of the petitioner that construction work of P.C.C. Drain and P.C.C. Road from Gulzarbagh Railway Station to the house of Shri Shiv Bachan Mishra Jee in Khairunia Bagicha under Ward No.56 of P.M.C., Patna for which amount has been sanctioned and orders have been issued, is not undertaken and as the work is not being undertaken, the people in the area are adversely affected. It is stated that the matter was taken up with the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7857 of 2017 dt.19-07-2017 2/2 government authorities at various levels and till date in spite of the fact that discussions have taken place and orders issued in the Department in June, 2016, the construction has not commenced. Keeping in view the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 shall look into the grievance of the petitioner and ensure implementation of the construction work as sanctioned and complete it within a reasonable period.

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 29.7.2017 Transmission Date N/A