Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53911/2022bail granted

Ajeet Misal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53911 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ajeet Misal Son of Vilash Dadaso Resident of Village Pachegaon , P.S. Shangola, District Sholapur (Maharastra), at present mohalla Rajendra Nagar, P.S, Dalsingsarai, District Samstipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of Explosive Substance Act.

Prosecution case, in short, is that 7-8 unknown miscreants came at the shop of the informant armed with pistol, katta and other weapons and looted away the gold and silver ornaments.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2022 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53911 of 2022(2) dt.21-12-2022 2/2 alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been made accused in the present case due to mistake of fact. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has transpired in this case in course of investigation. It is alleged that the stolen property was sold to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge that the property in question is stolen. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. case No.372 of 2022. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T