Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53732 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sunil Singh, S/O Late Karmdeo Singh, Resident of village- Padshar, P.S.- Karkat, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of inflicting blow of sharp cutting weapon on the head of the informant. The petitioner exhorted to kill, he began to inflict blow of sharp edged weapon indiscriminately.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53732 of 2022(2) dt.18-01-2023 2/2 has further submitted that earlier the father of the petitioner Karmdeo Singh had lodged a case Karakat P.S. Case No. 25 of 2021 against the informant and others. There is land dispute between the parties. As per injury report, the injured Rampujan Singh sustained simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance whereas the allegation against the petitioner is of inflicting blow of sharp edged weapon. The petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 33 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T