← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2548/2024disposed

Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Dipak Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2548 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9414 of 2023 ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Son of Ravindra Prasad, resident of Mauza-Madaini (near Opposite Pilot Baba Mandir), Police Station-Sasaram, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Dipak Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Vinod Kumar Pankaj, the Director, Land Acquisition Directorate, Patna. 3.

Mr. Kumar Ravi, the Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 4.

Mr. Navin Kumar, the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.

Mr. Zafar Hasan, the Competent Authority DFCCIL-cum-District Land Acquisition Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

6.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the Deputy Project Manager, D.F.C.C.I.L, Sasaram under DDU.

7.

Mr. Janak Kumar Singh, the Competent Authority D.F.C.C.I.L. East Railway Rohtas at Sasaram.

8.

Mr. Pramod Kumar, the Executive Engineer, Building Division, Sasaram, Rohtas.

9.

Mr. Rishikesh Shahpuri, the Sub-Registrar, Registration Office, Sasaram, Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pravashankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel 25 For the O.P. No. 6 and 7: Mr. Tiwari Shwetketu, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

Patna High Court MJC No.2548 of 2024(4) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 08.01.2024 passed in CWJC No. 9414 of 2023."

3. The show cause shows that the competent authority cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram has disposed of the representation of the petitioner vide an order dated 12.09.2024.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U