Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50836/2019bail granted

Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50836 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2018 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== KUNAL KUMAR Son of Pardeshi Prasad @ Nagendra Kumar Resident of Village - Nawada, P.S.- Sherghati, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Defence of the petitioner is that his name has come in the case during investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused Sonu Kumar, who has already been granted regular bail by the Court below itself. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50836 of 2019(5) dt.26-02-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in Sherghati Police Station Case No. 382/2018, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T