Washim Akaram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28693 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2015 Thana -NAWINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Washim Akaram S/o Late Md. Jumrati Ansari R/o Vill- Raghunathganj, P.S.- Nabinagar,District- Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 147 of 2015 for offence under Section 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. An allegation has been made that after enticing the sister of the informant, the petitioner has taken away her with him. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to an earlier case filed against him making identical allegation. There the sister of the informant has made a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. stating therein that both of them have entered into marriage. The document attached with this application is the proof of marriage between the petitioner and the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28693 of 2016 (2) dt.26-07-2016 sister of the Informant.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Washim Akaram, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 147 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T