Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18889 of 2021 ====================================================== Anita Devi W/o Birendra Kumar Singh resident of Village- Ward No.- 9 Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Bazar Samiti Road Buxar, P.O.- Gajadharganj P.S.- Buxar (T), District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate Buxar 4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Social Welfare Department, Buxar.

5.

The District Programme Officer, District- Buxar. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, District- Buxar. 7.

The District Co-ordinator ISSNIP Buxar District- Buxar. 8.

Bindu Devi W/o- Ramashish Singh resident of Village- Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, P.O. and P.S.- Buxar (T), District- Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the order passed by Respondent no.5, Communicated to the petitioner vide memo 1214 dated 19.11.2018 (Annexure-8) by which the selection of petitioner has been canceled from the post of

Patna High Court CWJC No.18889 of 2021(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/2 "Anganbari Sevika" bearing Anganbari center code No. 212 ward No.9 MohallaMahatma Gandhi Nagar, Buxar District Buxar, further the petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 06.07.2021 (Annexure 10) passed in Case No.

127/2018 by the Appellate authority i.e.

district Magistrate Buxar by which the cancelation of selection of petitioner passed by the District programme officer, Buxar has been upheld."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U