Patna High CourtCWJC/5151/2017dismissed

Neeraj Kumar Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-29Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.5151 of 2017 (2) dt.29-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5151 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Neeraj Kumar Rai, son of Shri Brijesh Rai, resident of Village + PostLilkar, P.S.- Sikandarpur, District- Ballia (U.P.)

2. Kumar, son of Shri Paras Prasad, resident of At- Marwari Mohalla, Narkatiyaganj, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

3. Pankaj Kumar Verma, son of Shri Sakaldeo Prasad, resident of Village+Post- Dharmpur, Via- Chanpatia, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.

4. Dilip Kumar, son of Late Dinath Prasad, resident of Village+PostChampatia, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran.

5. Ajay Kumar Rao, son of Shri Durgendra Rao, resident of At- Shyampur, P.O.- Sheorajpur, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran.

6. Vikas Kumar, son of Late Anil Singh, resident of Company Saraya, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas.

7. Devendra Prasad, son of Shri Sinhasan Prasad, resident of VillageBhainsahi, P.O.- Padarkhar, Via- Bagaha, P.S.- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran.

8. Ajay Kumar, son of Late Arun Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Rohua Rajaram, P.S.- Mushahri Ram, P.S.- Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar thr Principal Secretary, Finance Departmen, Bihar, Patna.

2. Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna through its Secretary.

3. Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna.

4. Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, AC to SC-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In view of the statement made in paragraphs 10 to 12 of the writ petition, no cause for indulgence is made out. The writ petition is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- U