Idmohamad Ali @ Idmohammad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary Dept. Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2008 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Idmohamad Ali @ Idmohammad, Son of Amarali Miyan @ Amarali, Resident of Village and PO- Kalyanpur, PS- Bhorey District -Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 5.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 6.

The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.

7.

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj. 8.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, District Gopalganj. 9.

The Station House Officer, Bhorey, District Gopalganj. 10.

The Station House Officer, Kateya, District Gopalganj. 11.

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Chaudhary, Son of Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Chaudhary, Resident of Village and PO- Kalyanpur, PS- Bhorey, DistGopalganj ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta For the State :

Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, GP-12 Mr. Vasant Vikas, AC to GP-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 11-08-2025 It appears from the impugned order (Annexure 'P/4') that the order under Section 3 of the Bihar Crime Control Act, 1981 was passed by the District Magistrate, Gopalganj whereunder a direction had been issued to the petitioner to make his attendance from 24.05.2025 to 24.07.2025 everyday in

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2008 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 Kateya Police Station.

2. Since the period stipulated in the impugned order has already expired and there is nothing on the record that any fresh order has been passed by the District Magistrate, in our opinion, this writ application has become infructuous.

3. This writ application is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Ajit Kumar, J) lekhi/- U