Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56150/2024dismissed

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-19Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56150 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Arvind Kumar son of Chandr Bali Bin Village- Madhopur, Ps- G.B Nagar Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 79 of 2024.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown persons have committed theft in the house of the informant and took away his mobile phone.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56150 of 2024(2) dt.19-08-2024 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 10.05.2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that during investigation, the name of the petitioner has figured in this case and the alleged mobile was recovered from his possession. He further submitted that the petitioner has also been made accused in seven more cases. During investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that as alleged mobile has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner as well as petitioner has a criminal antecedents of seven cases, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Arish/- U