Durga Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11946 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2019 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Durga Yadav Son Of Deo Nandan Yadav Resident Of Village- Chandisthan, P.S- Amas, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-07-2021 Heard the parties in virtual Court proceeding. Let the defects, if any, be removed within four weeks of the start of the physical Court.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 419/420/467/468/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he cheated to the informant by alluring her to get a job of teacher. When the informant did not get salary for few months after joining she inquired and got information that the petitioner had cheated her. Though the petitioner has got criminal antecedent, however, he is in custody since 16.01.2020.

Since the informant was herself indulged in getting backdoor entry on public post and considering the period already

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11946 of 2021(2) dt.27-07-2021 2/2 undergone by the petitioner and completion of investigation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Courtbelow where the case is pending in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 229 of 2019 with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T