Bideshi Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15238 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2019 Thana- KINJAR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Bideshi Manjhi Son Of Late Bhausagar Manjhi Resident of Village - Hazipur Mushari, P.S.- Kinjar, Distt.- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kinjar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier the bail application of petitioner was rejected vide order dated 18.03.2020. Vide order dated 28.07.2021, report was called for regarding the stage of trial and same has been received (kept at flag 'A'), which reveals that case is pending for police paper.

It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2019 having clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15238 of 2021(3) dt.08-09-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody and stage of trial, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Kinjar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2019, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T