Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63807 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2020 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav Son of Raghu Yadav @ Raghunath Yadav Resident of Village Jago Araji Koshikapur, Ward No.12, P.S. Birpur, District Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Madhav Raj, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By order dated 02.09.2021, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No.3928 of 2021 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now charge has been framed (Annexure-4 to the bail petition). Having considered the fact that charge has been framed, let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge Vth, Supaul in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No.85 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:

(1) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63807 of 2021(3) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(2) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date fixed in the case and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(3) That the petitioner will mark his attendance in the local police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move cancellation of his bail bond.

(4) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned, if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T