Amzad Ali @ Amzad Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56784 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2024 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Amzad Ali @ Amzad Hussain, Son of Ali Mohammad @ Ali Ahmad Miyan, Resident of village - Bargachhiya, P.S.- Uchakagaon, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

X, Daughter of Haidar Miyan, Resident of Village - Ujranarayanpur, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District - Gopalganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Natraj Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Heard Mr. Natraj Verma, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, the learned APP for the State.

2. This application has been filed for modification of condition '(v)' mentioned in Paragraph 6 of the order dated 18.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15315 of 2025 by this Court, whereby the petitioner was granted bail.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the conditions as contained in Paragraph 6 (v), the bail bonds of the petitioner were not accepted, as inadvertently in Paragraph 3 of the main bail application, one criminal antecedent which the petitioner carried was inadvertently not stated.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56784 of 2025(2) dt.22-08-2025 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of such a condition, despite bail being granted to him, he could not have been released.

5. The aforesaid bail application bearing Cr. Misc. No. 15315 of 2025 was allowed with the particular condition stated therein:

"6 (V) The learned court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification".

6. In view of such a condition, it was mandatory upon the petitioner to come out clean in stating the antecedent, and as such the present application stands dismissed.

7. The petitioner is directed to move this court afresh with a prayer for bail.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) manoj/- U T