Harendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11673 of 2023 ====================================================== Harendra Mahto S/o Late Tilak Mahto Resident of Village- Bahuarwa Kala, P.S.- Shikarpur, Dist.- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector-cum- District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.

2.

The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 3.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, Dist.- West Champaran. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5.

The Officer- in- Charge, Shikarpur Police Station, Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

6.

The Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts, through its Chairman, Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Chairman, Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts, Bihar, Patna. 8.

Ramesh Paswan, S/o Late Bhagan Paswan Resident of Village- Siswa, Bahuarwa Kala, P.S.- Shikarpur, Dist.- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar, G.P.-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. It appears that the petitioner without approaching the respondent authorities has stateforward approached this Court and as per writ application the petitioner seeks following reliefs:

I. To direct the officials respondents not to allow the private respondent to create disturbance/hindrance in day to day

Patna High Court CWJC No.11673 of 2023(5) dt.19-06-2024 2/2 functioning of the Religious Trust of Ram Janki Mandir situated at Village - Siswa, Bahuarwa Kala falling under Shikarpur Police Station of West Champaran District.

II. To direct the private respondent to hand over all the documents and receipts and other materials of Ram Janki Temple in question to the petitioner.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent-Board and the respondent-Board has directed the petitioner that he may approach before the respondent-Board for redressal of his grievance but he has directly approached to this Court.

4. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to approach the authority concerned and if the authority concerned is not redressed the grievance of the petitioner then the petitioner will approach this Court.

5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U