← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18882/2021disposed

M/S P.K. Construction Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Proprietor Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

2022-06-30The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18882 of 2021 ====================================================== M/s P.K. Construction Pvt. Ltd. Through its Proprietor Pintu Kumar Son of Ranjeet Mahto Resident of Mohalla -Khandpar, P.S. - Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, Patna Nagar Nigam, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer, South Bihar, Sub - division Water Resources, Drainage and Sewarage, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Chief Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Patna. 5.

The Assistant Director, Quality Control Road, Sub- Division, Patna City, Gulzarbag, Patna - 7.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Patliputra Division, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

7.

The Executive Engineer, Patna (West), Road Division, Road Construction, Department, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For the PMC :

Mr. Prasun Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Abbas Haider ( SC6 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/5

3/5

4/5 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner will be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law. Prayer allowed.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open to be agitated before the competent authority. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the

5/5 liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajivAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date