Chandan Pratap v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No 1569 of 2012 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 9686 of 2012 =========================================================== Chandan Pratap Son Of Sri Harbansh Mali Resident Of Village- Bamhore Khas Belhari, P.S. Mohania, District- Kaimur .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi

2. The Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Bihar Zone at Asiyana Digha Road, Patna- 800025

3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Muzaffarpur

4. The Presiding Officer, Recruitment Cell, CRPF, Asiyana Digha Road, Patna800025 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : N O N E For the Respondent/s : Mr SANJAY KUMAR, ASG =========================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT ANJANA MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 08-12-2015 Delay of 30 days in filing the appeal is condoned. IA No 6594 of 2012 stands disposed of.

2 Inspite of repeated calls, no one has appeared for the appellant. Shri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the Union of India is present.

3 Having gone through the records and the order of the learned Single Judge, we are not inclined to interfere. The CRPF

Patna High Court LPA No.1569 of 2012 dt.08-12-2015 Medical Board and the Appellate Medical Review Board both concurred that the appellant was not medically fit for recruitment contrary to the averment by the appellant that the Review Medical Board had found him fit.

4 In view of the aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere. This appeal is dismissed.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Anjana Mishra, J) U M.E.H./-