Manohar Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13006 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -641 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Manohar Yadav,

2. Jawahar Yadav, Both sons of Late Ramji Yadav, Residents of VillageBhadoul, P.S.- Bharrahi, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No. 641 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting the informant and his brother causing injuries to him. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case between the parties an the occurrence took place with regard to petty issue, which will be evident from the F.I.R itself and the injuries caused to the informant and his brother was found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the above submission.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13006 of 2018 (3) dt.19-04-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No. 641 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T