Rajesh Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50001 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -647 Year- 2013 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Son of Shri Laxmeshwar Thakur, Resident of Village - Madhubani, P.s. - Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Akhilesh Kumar, Son of Shri Ram Niranjan Thakur, Resident of Village - Rasalpur, P.S. - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur, At present residing at Siya Sadan, Farikka Chowk, Rewa Road, P.S. - Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aaruni Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the nature of allegations and fair antecedent of the petitioner, in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 647 of 2013, Tr. No. 3568 of 2014, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50001 of 2015 (2) dt.03-11-2015 2/2 other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under sections 438(2) Cr. P. C.
That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T