Ranjit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49494 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2017 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== RANJIT PASWAN Son of Panchu Paswan, Resident of Village - Tisiauta Dhrampur, P.S.- Jandaha, Dist.- vaishali-844141 (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Renu Devi Wife of Shivnath Mahato, Resident of Village - Bahasi Damodar, P.S.- Jandaha, Dist.- Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-3 of 2017 registered for offence punishable under sections 448, 383, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and 12 of POCSO Act. Allegation has been made against Siyaram Paswan, he entered into the house and forcibly tried to commit rape on the minor daughter of complainant.

The petitioner is brother-in-law of the main accused namely Siyaram Paswan. There is no attribution of outraging the modesty of the victim girl against this petitioner. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49494 of 2019(2) dt.07-08-2019 2/2 petitioner has no criminal history.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-3 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T