Ravikant Bharti v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11872 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Ravikant Bharti, son of Chhatu Ravidas @ Chhatu Ravi, Resident of Rashrtiyegunj Mazar Sharif, Near Station Road, Phulwarisharif, Police Station- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Surya Swetabh and Mr. Rakesh Roshan Singh, Advocates.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph no. 1 of the bail application, in course of the day.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 379, 313/34 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11872 of 2018 (2) dt.05-03-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no medical examination report in respect of an offence under Section 313 of the IPC. Rests of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The allegation of marriage itself is denied by the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Darbhanga, in connection with Darbhanga Mahila P.S. Case No. 43 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T