Ramakant Prasad Kushwaha @ Ramakant Pd. And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23601 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2018 Thana -GHORASAHAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Ramakant Prasad Kushwaha @ Ramakant Pd., Son of Pradeshi Mahto,
2. Sita Devi, Wife of Ramakant Prasad Kushwaha @ Ramakant Pd.,
3. Pradeshi Mahto, Son of Late Daroga Mahto,
4. Jiyani Devi, Wife of Pradeshi Mahto, All residents of VillageBarwakala, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S.Case no.66 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325,354(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by Farsa on head causing injury.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the land dispute is from before and Title Suit is going in between the parties and the injuries are simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23601 of 2018 (2) dt.20-04-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., sikrahna, Dhaka, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Ghorasahan P.S.Case No.66 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T