← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10693/2017disposed

Nageshwar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10693 of 2017 ====================================================== Nageshwar Mahto son of late Nirpan Mahto, presently working asChaukiar, Public Health Sub-Division Chakiya under Public Health Division, Dhaka, District East Champaran at Motihari.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Engneer-in-Chief-cum Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Motihari.

6. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Dhaka, District East Champaran.

7. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Sub-Division, Chakiya, District East Champaran at Motihari.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Giri- Gp9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-04-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.2 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a composite representation before the respondent no.2 regarding

Patna High Court CWJC No.10693 of 2017 (2) dt.17-04-2018 2/2 his grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U