Ranjeet Mahto @ Ranjeet Kumar Mahto @ Ranjeet Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54070 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2003 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== RANJEET MAHTO @ RANJEET KUMAR MAHTO @ RANJEET KUMAR SINGH S/O BALESHWAR MAHTO Resident of village- Laghunia Raghu Kant, Bhiri Tol, P.S.- Musarigharari, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act and later on Section 307 IPC was added.

As per allegation in the FIR, informant was stopped by three unknown culprits armed with gun fired upon the informant and Raj Raushan as a result of which Raj Raushan received injury and fell down.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case because near the place of occurrence, petitioner's house is situated and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54070 of 2022(4) dt.14-03-2023 2/2 he was found roaming near the place of occurrence. No one is eye witness of the alleged incident neither petitioner is named in the FIR. Petitioner has no concern with other two co-accused persons, who are resident of Bejhadeeh whereas petitioner resides in different village. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted and cognizance has also been taken. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 8.6.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMIV, Samastipur in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 36 of 2003 (G.R. no. 628 of 2003).

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U