Bijay Kumar @ Bijay Kumar Sah @ Bijoy Kumar Sah @ Bijay Sah @ Dr. Bijay Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58512 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2024 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Bijay Kumar @ Bijay Kumar Sah @ Bijoy Kumar Sah @ Bijay Sah @ Dr. Bijay Sah Son of Late Chhabinath Sah Resident of Village- Kusamar, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 304 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have administered some injection to the mother of informant, as a result of which she died.
4. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. The First Information Report has been lodged after a delay of three days without any plausible explanation. Further submission is that petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58512 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 2/2 not a doctor. No clinic is run by the petitioner. Petitioner is only a pharmacist, runs a medical shop for selling medicines as per medical prescription. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer for bail by contending that without having requisite qualification and experience, treated the mother of informant, who after taking injection, died.
6. Having considered the nature of accusation and the gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T