Bhim Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10017 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2020 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== BHIM YADAV SON OF CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILLAGE- PARSA, P.S.- GAUNAHA, DIST.- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rita Verma, APP For the informant :
Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 23-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with a case registered under sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegations in the F.I.R., seven named accused persons including the petitoner herein are stated to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the FIR are false and concocted. The accused son of the petitoner namely Rahul Kumar and the daughter of the informant were in a relationship and they eloped. The petitioner does not know about the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10017 of 2021(4) dt.23-08-2021 2/2 whereabouts of the daughter of the informant. The main accused Rahul Kumar is in custody. The petitioner is in custody since 29.9.2020 and has no criminal antecedent. Investigation in the case has concluded.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner is a named accused in the kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant who has still not been recovered.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case including the minor daughter of the informant still not having been recovered, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U