Rajeev Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10405 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2017 Thana -ASARGANJ District- MUNGER ====================================================== Rajeev Mandal, S/o Binod Mandal, R/o Village- Baluwahi, P.S.- Ashrganj, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Asarganj P.S. Case No. 83 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that one of the co-accused Gautam Mandal with similar allegation has already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 51359 of 2017 Learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that all the injuries sustained by the injured were

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10405 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 2/2 simple in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 83 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T