← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52877/2025bail granted

Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-08Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52877 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- KARPURIGRAM District- Samastipur ====================================================== Golu Kumar S/o- Ashok Paswan R/V- Dhurlakh Ps- Mussfail DistrictSamstipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Karpurigram P.S. Case No.43 of 2025 registered for the offence under section 309(4) of B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, while the informant, who is an employee of Credit Axis Gramin Ltd. Company, was going to deposit cash on his motorcycle, two miscreants looted the cash, a tab, etc. When he protested, one of the miscreants fired gun shot and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name has surfaced on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52877 of 2025(4) dt.08-01-2026 2/3 basis of video allegedly recorded by the informant and the police, during the course of investigation, traced the registration number of motorcycle and the owner of the motorcycle Vikram Kumar, who disclosed to the police that the said bike was taken by his cousin Golu Kumar (the petitioner) on the alleged date of occurrence and on that basis, the petitioner was apprehended by the police. It is further submitted that petitioner is under custody since 01.05.2025. He has also submitted that on exactly similar footing, co-accused Prem Chandra Kumar has been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 55322 of 2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/trial. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

5. The learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the fact that co-accused has been granted bail, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Karpurigram P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court where the case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52877 of 2025(4) dt.08-01-2026 3/3 pending/Successor Court, subject to the following conditions:- (I) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be the family member/close relative of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and would make himself available on each and every date fixed by the trial Court and would co-operate in getting the charges framed and in case of non-appearance on any date without any sufficient reason, the learned trial Court is liberty to cancel the bail bonds.

(III) The learned trial Court would also be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds if it has been found that the petitioner is involved in any other case of similar nature. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T