Uma Shankar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64077 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2018 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== UMA SHANKAR MISHRA S/o Sridhar Mishra R/o Village - Sonbarsa, P.S. - Shahpur (karnamepur), District - Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sheo Jee Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Harendra Prasad Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-02-2022 Heard the parties through virtual Court proceedings. From perusal of the order-sheet, it appears that inadvertently, the order no.2 dated 17.11.2021 has been wrongly typed as order no.7 and order no.3 dated 22.12.2021 has been typed as order no.8.
Accordingly, let it be so corrected that the order dated 17.11.2021 be read as order no.2 and order dated 22.12.2021 be read as order no.3.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shahpur (Karnamepur) P.S. Case No.302 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/120(B)/34 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act.
Vide order dated 17.11.2021, a report was called for,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64077 of 2021(4) dt.02-02-2022 2/2 regarding the stage of trial. In compliance thereof, a report sent by learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara dated 16.12.2021, is kept at flag 'A', whereby it is submitted that the time likely to be taken to conclude the trial is about three months.
Considering the submissions made in the report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner named above. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within three months. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T