Sudama Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8488 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2017 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan ======================================================
1. Sudama Singh, S/o Late Shyam Lal Singh,
2. Jagmati Devi W/o Sudama Singh, Both R/o Village- Bishunpura, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Nautan P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201, 120B of the IPC.
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that these petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. The other family members have already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 05.02.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6471 of 2018. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8488 of 2018(3) dt.21-03-2018 2/2 six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- XII, Siwan, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T