Sheela Kumari Singh v. Sudhir Kumar Singh Claim Himself As Sudhir Prasad Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.453 of 2021 ====================================================== Sheela Kumari Singh Wife of Sri Bal Krishna Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Shankarpur, Police Station - Imamganj, District- Gaya at present residing at Mithila Bhawan, Mohalla - Janakpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sudhir Kumar Singh claim himself as Sudhir Prasad Singh Son of Sri Chandeshwar Singh @ Chandeshwar Singh Resident of Village - Ranipur, Police Station - Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. 2.

Mahesh Prasad Son of Mahangu Singh Resident of Village - Piro, Police Station - Piro, District- Bhojpur.

3.

Sudhir Kumar Son of Mahangu Singh Resident of Village - Piro, Police Station - Piro, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide order dated 5th March, 2005 in Probate Case No.105 of 2004, the probate case was decided in favour of the respondent, Sudhir Kumar Singh, the petitioner filed Revocation Case No.1 of 2005 to revoke the probate decree granted in favour of respondents vide order dated 5th March, 2005. The main contention of the petitioner is that the Revocation case is pending for 16 years but still it has not been disposed of. He has also submitted that in Misc. Appeal No.196

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.453 of 2021(2) dt.03-12-2021 2/2 of 2007 vide order dated 26th September, 2008, this Court directed the Court below to dispose of the interim injunction petition within a period of six months to the Court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per direction of this Court that petition was disposed of and the status quo was granted, but after a lapse of 16 years, the case has not been concluded as yet.

In the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the Court below is directed to take endeavour for expeditious disposal of the case, subject to priority list of his docket and any other legal or procedural impediment.

With these observations and directions, this Civil Misc. petition is being disposed of.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) sanjeev/- U