Amresh Kumar @ Mahi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52791 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Amresh Kumar @ Mahi, S/o Satendra Mistri @ Satyendra Mistri, R/o Village - Sihuli Khaira, P.S - Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025 dated 10.05.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 69 and 109 of B.N.S, 2023.
3. As per allegation, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with 19 years old daughter of the informant for the last six months on false promise to marry her and when the victim asked him to marry her, she was attempted to be strangulated.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, friendship
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52791 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 developed between the petitioner and the alleged victim on instagram and they established consensual physical relationship. He further submits that there is no truth in the allegation and this allegation has been made only with intent to pressurize to marry, whereas there was no such promise. He further submits that charge-sheet has been already submitted.
5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 10.05.2025.
6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.
8. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.
9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025 on the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52791 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 (i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) shoaib/- U T