Ramashray Ram v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16887 of 2016 =========================================================== Ramashray Ram, S/o Late Bhuwan Ram, Resident of Village-Chhata P.O.-Chapiya Bujurg, P.S.-Gussainganj, District-Siwan .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Tele Communication, New Delhi
2. The Chief General Manager (T), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Sanchar Bhawan, Budha Marg, Patna
3. The General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Chapra, Office of the G.M.T.D., Chapra, District-Saran
4. The Sub-Divisional Engineer (Telephone), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Srinagar, Siwan, District-Siwan
5. The Sub-Divisional Officer,(Phone), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, C Main Telephone Exchange, Gopalganj Road, District-Siwan .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Mr. Satyavrat Verma, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 18-03-2017 Procured kind of medical certificates only to fill in the gaps cannot form the basis for condonation of delay of 15 years. The Tribunal, therefore, has dismissed OA 166/2016 as well as MA 81/2016 on 28.07.2016 refusing to condone any kind of delay and allow relief to the petitioner.
The Tribunal was absolutely correct in not entertaining the OA or the MA on made up kind of prescriptions obtained to fill in
Patna High Court CWJC No.16887 of 2016 dt.18-03-2017 2/2 the blanks between 20th of September, 2000 to 21.03.2015. Writ is dismissed. The impugned order does not suffer from any vice.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 21.03.2017 Transmission Date NA