Rameshwar Thakur And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7858 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2017 Thana -GANGABRIDGE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Rameshwar Thakur, Son of Late Chanardip Thakur, Resident of Village-Terasia, Post Office-Ratnakar/ Hajipur Industrial Area, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District-Vaishali.

2. Sanjay Thakur, Son of Rameshwar Thakur, Resident of Village-Terasia, P.S. Ratnakar, Hajipur Industrial Area, P.S. Ganga Bridge, Distt. Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 54 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and younger brother of husband of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody.

In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7858 of 2018 (3) dt.05-03-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 54 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T