Bilas Sah And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46010 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2015 Thana -SONBERSA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Bilas Sah son of Budhu Sah
2. Pramila Devi wife of Bilas Sah
3. Manish Sah @ Manish Kumar son of Bilas Sah All resident of villageBhutahi, P.S. Sonebarsa, District- Sitamarhi
4. Sunit Devi, son of Prabhat Sah
5. Prabhat Sah son of Devendra Sah Both resident of village- Indarwa, P.S. Sonebarsa, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Bibha Kumari Devi, Wife of Umesh Sah and daughter of Lakshman Sah, Resident of village- Brahmpuri, P.S.- Malangwa, District- Sarlahi (Nepal) .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioners are father, mother and relatives of the husband of the informant.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. They have been falsely implicated in the present case. Heard learned A.P.P. also. He has opposed the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46010 of 2015 (7) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sonebarsa P.S. Case no. 118 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T