Bablu Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49607 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -3927 Year- 2012 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Bablu Mandal, S/o Sri Shivanand Mandal, Village- Khaikha ,ward no. 10. P.S Forbesganj, District Araria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ganga Pd. Mandal, R/O Village- Vila Mohan Tar Tola, P.S Simraha District Araria.

.... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ashraf Ansari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 3927(C) of 2012 for the offences instituted under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner and other subjected the complainant to mental and physical cruelties in various ways including physical assault in connection with their demand of motorcycle and Rs. 50,000/- cash. She has also alleged that her husband confined her in a room and physically assaulted with lathi, fists and feet. Her father tried to pacify the matter which was effectless. Lastly, the accused persons brutally assaulted her with fists, feet and lathi and turned her out of the house snatching

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49607 of 2015 (3) dt.08-02-2016 2/2 her ornaments. When her father went to the house of the accused persons, they insulted him and drove him away from there and threatened him to cause the death of whole family if lodged any case.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Heard learned counsel for the State and the counsel who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the father of the complainant. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 admits that the complainant of the present case has died 11⁄2 years back after instituting the present complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 3927(C) of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T