Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Singh @ Saroj Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53856 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Singh @ Saroj Singh S/o Nirmal Kumar Singh Resident of Gopalpur, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vikash Khanna For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 133/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 427, 353, 332, 333, 384, 120(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, one injured person was referred to the hospital but during the course of treatment he died due to which several persons blocked the road to express the resentment. The informant alongwith police officials reached at the place of occurrence for clearing the crowd, during course of clearing the crowd, the people attacked on the police officials and the petitioner is one among them who is said to have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 assaulted the police officials.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.05.2025 and bears no criminal antecedent. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is only member of mob and he has nothing to do with the alleged occurrence. Allegations are general and omnibus in nature and there is no specific overt-act against the petitioner. He orally submits that charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 with Dinara P.S. Case No. 133/2021, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.
(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T