← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54138/2022bail granted

Ravi Raj @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-18Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54138 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2022 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== RAVI RAJ @ BITTU Son of Ajay Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Nadauwa, P.S.- Baniapur, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harsh Anuj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 413 and 414 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on seeing the police some person started fleeing away but one person was apprehended who disclosed his name as Manu Sharma. On being asked, he also disclosed that all the three motorcycles were stolen property and he also disclosed the name of his associates as the petitioner Ravi Raj and the co-accused Tej Pratap Rai. It is further alleged that they have brought the said three motorcycles

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54138 of 2022(2) dt.18-01-2023 2/2 for purchase and sell.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is accused in one more criminal case as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that no motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T