Paras Nath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18754 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2017 Thana- CHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== Paras Nath Prasad S/o late Bindeshwari Lal @ Late Dineshwar Prasad, R/o Village- Belahiya, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 138 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per statement made in the complaint petition that the eldest daughter of the Complainant was married with Shambhu Prasad who wanted to grab the sole house where the widow Complainant along with her daughter were residing. By surreptitiously Shambhu Prasad has got the land executed by the eldest daughter of the Complainant. It has been alleged in the complaint petition that they wanted to grab the property of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18754 of 2018(2) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 Complainant by hook or by crook and wanted to evict them from the house.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a deed writer and he has no idea about the story which is behind the scene.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Paras Nath Prasad is rejected with a liberty to the petitioner to the petitioner to surrender before the court below within a period of two weeks from today and pray for bail. The court below is also directed to consider the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender and will pass order accordingly without being prejudiced by this order. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T