Kapildeo Mistry v. The State Of Bihar Through The General Director Cum General Commandant,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19034 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Kapildeo Mistry Son of Late Mabir Mistry Resident of Village - Dahiyarganj, Post Office - Hasanganj, Police Station - Hasanganj, DistrictKatihar. 2.

Visundeo Thakur, Son of Late Nathan Thakur Resident of Mohalla - T.V. Tower, Near Police Kendra, P.O. - Court Compound, Police Station - Sahayak, District- Katihar.

3.

Kamaldeo Paswan Son of Late Bisu Paswan, Resident of Village - Naya Tola, P.O. and Police Station - Manihari, District- Katihar. 4.

Amiruddin Son of Late Julu Rahman Resident of Village - Jhun - Jhuna, P.O. Kafar Kothi, Police Station - Barari, District- Katihar. 5.

Laxman Choudhary Son of Late Gyanchand Choudhary Resident of Village Naya Tola Mahiyapur Pagalbari, P.O. - Nayranpur, Police Station - Manihari, District- Katihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the General Director cum General Commandant, Bihar Home Guard, Head Quarter, Chajju Bag, Patna - 800001. 2.

The Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

4.

The District Commandant, Bihar Home Guard, Court Compound, Katihar. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Katihar.

6.

The Officer - in - charge, Abatpur, Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Sc8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023

1. The petitioners' grievance for revocation of the order of suspension dated 10-9-2020, as per submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, does not survive, as the same has been revoked on completion of the two years period specified in the impugned order itself.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19034 of 2021(3) dt.18-09-2023 2/2

2. So far as the complaint of large scale irregularities regarding inquiry by CID and CBI, this Court would only observe that the writ application has not been filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

3. The writ application is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U