Krishna Nandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14039 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Krishna Nandan Kumar Son of Upendra Bhagat Resident of VillageBhatanhiya, P.S.- Narkatiya, District- East Champaran, Motihari. 2.
Shashi Bhushan Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of VillageShishbaniya, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Managing Director North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Managing Director North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Bihar, Patna.
3.
The General Manager, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Electricity Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Raxaul, District- East Champaran, Motihari.
5.
The Assistant, Electricity Engineer, Electric Supply Sub Division, Dhaka, District- East Champaran, Motihari.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Advocate Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of nature of the writ of Mandamus for direction to respondents to reinstate the service to the petitioners on the post of Data Entry Operator as they are discharging duty since their appointment, suddenly
Patna High Court CWJC No.14039 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 they have been debarred from work without notice and without issuance the order of termination and further issue direction to the respondents for considering the application of the petitioners and further issue direction to allow to work as others have been allowed to work and further give other legal consequential benefits attached to the post. "
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U